Enquire about or register for Enlit Europe 2026 in Vienna
More info
Home
/
Why grid reliability is won and lost at the edge
Partner content

Why grid reliability is won and lost at the edge

Guest/partner contributor
Posted on: 20 July 2026

For decades, grid reliability has largely been managed from the top down, with utilities relying heavily on centralised systems, writes Stefan Zschiegner.

Image credit: Itron
Image credit: Itron

That approach was effective when networks were relatively stable and predictable. Today, however, the conditions that determine reliability are shifting closer to the edge of the network, where electrification is accelerating, distributed energy resources are proliferating and demand patterns are becoming more dynamic and less predictable. 

These pressures are increasingly concentrated within low voltage systems, reshaping how power flows and where issues first emerge.

As a result, reliability is now determined in the parts of the network that are hardest to see and manage. Challenges are more localised and volatile, often emerging faster than utilities can respond. Conditions that once evolved gradually can now change in near real time at the feeder or transformer level, while visibility into those areas has historically been limited. This leaves many utilities operating with a persistent gap between what’s happening across the network and their ability to detect, assess and respond.

Much of this challenge stems from the fact that existing operational models weren’t designed to support time sensitive, localised decision-making. Traditional metering and centralised analytics still provide important value, but are better suited for planning and retrospective analysis than for real-time operations at the low voltage level. 

Undetected issues

This gap creates friction in day-to-day operations. Emerging issues may go undetected until they result in outages. Restoration efforts can be slowed by uncertainty around fault location or outage scope, and capacity constraints may only become visible once they begin to affect service delivery.

These limitations translate directly into business impact. Longer or more complex outages affect SAIDI and CAIDI performance, and unanticipated faults increase interruption frequency and impact SAIFI. 

Uncertainty around network conditions often leads to conservative planning decisions, resulting in earlier or broader capital investment than may ultimately be necessary. In a grid that is becoming more distributed and variable every day, utilities need a more immediate and actionable understanding of what’s happening and where.

Grid awareness 

A clearer, more continuous view of low voltage conditions begins to address this gap by allowing utilities to operate with greater agility and precision. When operators have better visibility into transformer loading, voltage behaviour and localised constraints, they can identify issues earlier and make more informed decisions about how to manage the network. This supports both day-to-day operations and long-term planning by grounding investment decisions in observed conditions rather than assumptions.

Additionally, utilities can improve asset utilisation and delay unnecessary upgrades by making better use of existing infrastructure while supporting increasing levels of distributed energy and accommodating new demand without compromising performance. In both cases, improved awareness directly supports reliability, capacity and cost management.

Earlier visibility into abnormal conditions allows utilities to address reliability challenges before they escalate into outages. Rather than relying on customer calls or downstream indicators, operators can identify patterns that point to emerging issues, including asset degradation, unusual load behaviour or early stage faults across the network. Intervening earlier reduces the likelihood of service disruptions and shifts toward a more proactive operating model.

Fewer unplanned outages mean stronger reliability performance, lower emergency response costs and a better overall customer experience. It also enables more strategic use of field resources, allowing crews to be deployed based on need rather than reacting to events after the fact. Over time, this shift from reactive to proactive operations becomes a key component of both reliability and operational efficiency.

Accelerating restoration

Even with more proactive management, outages will still occur. When they do, the speed and accuracy of response matters. Greater awareness at the edge allows utilities to understand the scope of an outage more quickly, identify likely fault locations and coordinate restoration activities with greater precision. This reduces time spent diagnosing issues and helps ensure the right actions are taken earlier in the restoration process.

Equally important is the ability to confirm when restoration is complete. Greater confidence in restoration reduces repeat outages and unnecessary truck rolls and improves communication with customers. These improvements have a direct impact on reliability metrics, helping reduce outage duration and improve restoration efficiency, while strengthening trust in service reliability from a customer perspective.

A key advantage of this shift is that it does not require a complete overhaul of existing infrastructure. Capabilities can be introduced incrementally, allowing organisations to focus on specific outcomes such as improving outage response, increasing low voltage visibility or orchestrating DERs. As those capabilities deliver value, they can be expanded over time in a way that aligns with operational priorities, regulatory requirements and regional conditions.

This phased approach is particularly important in a global context, where utilities are operating at different levels of grid maturity and facing different external pressures. It offers a path forward that balances modernisation with risk management while still delivering measurable improvements along the way.

You might be interested in: Intelligence at the edge: How utilities can maintain reliability in a variable grid

Opportunities converge

As these trends continue to unfold, the definition of reliability is evolving alongside them. It is no longer defined solely by how quickly power can be restored after an outage, but increasingly by how effectively utilities can anticipate, manage and mitigate issues before they affect customers. Achieving that requires a deeper understanding of network behaviour and the ability to act in a timely and targeted way.

The low voltage edge is where many of these challenges and opportunities converge. Here, variability is most pronounced, constraints surface first and improved awareness can have the greatest operational impact.  Utilities that extend visibility and control to this layer are better positioned to deliver tangible and continuous improvements for more reliable and affordable service in an increasingly complex and dynamic energy landscape.

Ultimately, this transition depends less on any single technology and more on how effectively utilities partner with industry leaders to deliver solutions and integrate them into the business that turn insights into business outcomes: fewer interruptions, shorter outage durations, better use of infrastructure and a more resilient grid. This is how reliability is won at the grid edge.

About the author

Stefan Zschiegner joined Itron in March 2020 as vice-president of product management for the Outcomes business. Prior to joining Itron, he held product business leadership roles driving digital transformation in telecom and in manufacturing. 

Share:
Join the community for freeAnd get access to all content

Related companies

Itron

Latest content

Latest in Digitalisation

All articles